Bizar dat iemand dat gewoon doet.

Hier wel een mooi filmpje van een drone boven Mexico City Airport (gemaakt met de volledige medewerking en toestemming van het vliegveld etc)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMWeVvjXytE

konijntje schreef:...Mexico City Airport (gemaakt met de volledige medewerking en toestemming van het vliegveld etc)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMWeVvjXytE

Aardig muziekje

Ik zag gisteren een of andere malloot aan de gang met een radiografisch bestuurbaar vliegtuigje boven EHLE.

Die dingen zijn echt een verdomde pest aant worden. Reglementering dient hier te komen. Waar ik het meeste voor vrees, is voor de privacy. Dat er plots op een zonnige zomerdag zo'n ding boven je huis komt vliegen en vrolijk alles ligt te filmen.

Hier nog een voorbeeldje dichter bij huis:
http://www.telegraaf.nl/prive/26209099/__Drone_Rieu_in_beslag_genomen__.html

Pierre Rieu, zoon en vice-president van het productiebedrijf van André Rieu bevestigt dat de drone direct na afloop van het concert door de politie is meegenomen."Ik ga er niet omheen draaien: we zijn fout geweest en dat wisten we. Om heel eerlijk te zijn: we hebben het risico bewust genomen. Gegokt en verloren dus, meer kan ik er niet van maken”, vertelt hij aan de krant.

Rieu spreekt echter met klem tegen dat er sprake is geweest van een gevaarlijke situatie. "We hebben doelbewust niet boven het publiek gevlogen, maar hoofdzakelijk achter het podium en rond het Vrijthof.”

Nou nog iemand die hem aan het verstand peutert dat hij daar midden in de CTR van Maastricht-Aachen Airport zit?

Dat er plots op een zonnige zomerdag zo'n ding boven je huis komt vliegen en vrolijk alles ligt te filmen.

Dat lijkt mij nog het minste probleem: die schiet je gewoon uit de lucht, toch? Lijkt me nogal wat zorgwekkender dat je zou kunnen een mid-air doen met zo'n ding, nogal wat idioten lijken er juist de vliegvelden mee op te zoeken dus start en landing kunnen lekker nog wat gevaarlijker worden.

Drones mogen absoluut niet op vliegvelden vliegen, levensgevaarlijk! Ik had die knul eens goed toegesproken... :mad:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-9MELr4oEY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-9MELr4oEY

Tsija... :confused:

While Filming Invergarry Castle in The Great Glen these four F15 jets came screaming past

Wat maakt die drone een snertherrie zeg... sorry dat ik het zeg...

...here we go again... :rolleyes:

Incident: LAM B737 at Tete on Jan 5th 2017, collision with a drone

http://avherald.com/h?article=4a319157&opt=0 (heeft foto's)
/
https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=192598

stratofreighter schreef:...here we go again... :rolleyes:

http://avherald.com/h?article=4a319157&opt=0 (heeft foto's)
/
https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=192598

...niks geen drone, structural failure...
https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=192598

The Mozambique's Civil Aviation Authority (ICAM) investigated the damage and concluded the radome most likely failed as result of a structural failure caused by air flow pressure.
The radome of C9-BAQ was acquired as a used part from an American company that provides aviation components and spare parts. The IACM believes that the radome failed because of defective repairs in the past. It had been installed on the aircraft during major maintenance in South Africa on Jun 27th 2016.

...voor wie het gemist had....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbXgK3PyZsk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbXgK3PyZsk

http://www.flyingmag.com/dji-mavic-pro-flies-within-300-feet-airplanes-on-approach?src=SOC&dom=fb
/
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-40633913

BBC

Drone 'threat' to planes over Israel

17 July 2017

A man has been arrested on suspicion of flying a consumer drone close to planes as they prepared to land in Tel Aviv.

The 21-year-old was held after footage was posted to YouTube and shared on Facebook and Twitter.

Israeli reports say that he has been put under five days of house arrest and the police have confiscated a drone and mobile phone while they carry out further investigations.

Israel's Transport Ministry described a "disturbing and serious incident".

The YouTube posting suggested the drone had been flying as close as 90ft (27m) to the passenger aircraft.

However, the suspect was later quoted on the Hebrew-language Israel Today news site
as saying that the true distance had been more than three times that figure.

The video, which is still online,
states a Mavic Pro drone was used to capture the footage of aeroplanes making their final descent to Sde Dov airport.

In some cases, the planes appear to be the same altitude as the drone.
In others, the jets are closer to the sea.

The video also appears to show a man,
filmed from above, controlling the drone while seated outside a bar.

The edited material was uploaded to YouTube on Thursday and shared on other social media the same day.

It has since clocked up more than 70,000 views,
with many of the resulting comments criticising the film-maker's "stupidity"
and saying that viewers had reported it to the local authorities.

"The incident was reported to the Israel Police
and the drone operator was sent to five days of house arrest,"
Noam Rosenberg, a spokesman for Israel's Civil Aviation Authority told the BBC.

"During these days, the Israeli Police is formulating the indictment against him.

"The response of the Israel Police expresses the authorities' policy against drone operators acting in a reckless, extravagant, unlawfully way and harming flight safety."

DJI - the Chinese-maker of the Mavic Pro - has also condemned the filming.

"We stand ready to assist national aviation authorities as they investigate a recent wave of photos and videos showing clear and intentional lawbreaking in ways that pose real danger to manned air traffic," it said in a statement.

DJI said its drones came equipped with software that should prevent them flying within five miles (8km) of Sde Dov airport unless the feature had been disabled.

Consumer drones are an increasing headache for airport operators across the globe.

Earlier this month, Gatwick Airport, near London, had to close its runway and diverted flights after a UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) was spotted close by.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau is investigating a suspected midair collision between a drone and a light aircraft near to Adelaide.

Research by Cranfield University into aircraft-drone collisions indicates they need not be fatal but lithium-ion batteries used by UAVs mean they can pose a greater threat than bird strikes.

...en weer wat...
https://news.aviation-safety.net/2017/07/25/uk-airprox-board-saab-340-missed-drone-just-5-meters-near-edinburgh/

The U.K. Airprox Board detailed an incident in which a Saab 340 aircraft missed a drone by just 5 meters as it was descending towards Edinburgh Airport, U.K. on May 19, 2017.

Loganair flight BE6994, a Saab 340B (G-LGNE) was getting vectors from Edinburgh radar to intercept the ILS LOC RW06 at Edinburgh.

When starting a turn to intercept the localizer all three crew members on the flight deck saw a dark coloured drone pass down the right-hand side of the aircraft.

It was perfectly level with them and passed only just beyond the wing-tip, approx 15m from the flight deck and 5m from the wing-tip.

It was so close and happened so fast that avoiding action was not possible.

De Amerikaanse marine is drones die in de buurt van bemande vliegtuigen komen nu ook helemaal zat...

https://news.usni.org/2017/08/08/iranian-drone-harasses-fa-18e-super-hornet-preparing-land-uss-nimitz

August 8, 2017 12:24 PM

This post has been updated to include U.S. Naval Forces Central Command’s official statement on the incident.

According to the NAVCENT statement,
“despite repeated radio calls to stay clear
of active fixed-wing flight operations in vicinity of USS Nimitz,
the QOM-1 executed unsafe and unprofessional altitude changes
in the close vicinity of an F/A-18E
in a holding pattern preparing to land on the aircraft carrier.”

The following is U.S. Naval Forces Central Command’s full statement on the incident:

"While operating in international airspace in the Central Arabian Gulf,
an F/A-18E Super Hornet from the “Argonauts” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147 assigned to the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68)
had an unsafe and unprofessional interaction with an Iranian QOM-1 unmanned aerial vehicle Aug. 8.

Despite repeated radio calls
to stay clear of active fixed-wing flight operations
in vicinity of USS Nimitz,
the QOM-1 executed unsafe and unprofessional altitude changes
in the close vicinity of an F/A-18E in a holding pattern preparing to land on the aircraft carrier.

The F/A-18E maneuvered to avoid collision
with the QOM-1
resulting in a lateral separation of approximately 200 feet and a vertical separation of approximately 100 feet.

The dangerous maneuver by the QOM-1 in the known vicinity of fixed wing flight operations
and at coincident altitude with operating aircraft
created a collision hazard and is not in keeping with international maritime customs and laws.

This is the 13th unsafe and/or unprofessional interaction between U.S. and Iranian maritime forces in 2017.

Zie verder
https://news.usni.org/2017/08/08/iranian-drone-harasses-fa-18e-super-hornet-preparing-land-uss-nimitz

...daar gaan we weer... :rolleyes:

https://atwonline.com/eco-aviation/environmentalists-fly-drones-near-heathrow-protest-expansion
/
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-49509852
/
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/29/heathrow-activists-fly-drones-attempt-ground-flights

Thu 29 Aug 2019 10.31 BST

Activists with Heathrow Pause, a splinter group of Extinction Rebellion,
have said they will operate small toy drones from 3am on Friday 13 September.

A spokesman for the organisation said it expected “somewhere between 50 to a couple of hundred people” to be involved in the action,
with each person using a drone.
With disruption intended to last for a number of days and potentially longer, the activists said they “can’t stand aside” and had to act.

“From 13 September, we will exploit a loophole in Heathrow airport’s health and safety protocols and fly toy drones within its restricted zone,” the group said.
“It is our understanding that the airport’s authorities will respond by grounding all flights.
Drones will not be flown in flight paths and there will be no risk of harm to anyone.

The group said the small, lightweight drones would not be flown above head height or on flight paths,
and activists planned to fly them within the three-mile (5km) exclusion zone surrounding the airport.

With the airport to be given an hour’s notice before each flight,
drones will be flown at regular intervals,
ensuring that to “comply with Heathrow’s own rules, no aircraft flights will take place”.

A Metropolitan police spokeswoman said the force was aware of the planned protest.

...vandaag...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/sep/13/heathrow-protests-two-held-near-airport-as-activists-threaten-drone-disruption

Fri 13 Sep 2019
07.28 BST

Flights operate as normal after climate activists ‘blocked by signal-jamming technology’

Two people have been arrested as protesters
attempted to fly drones near Heathrow
to highlight the role air travel plays in the escalating climate emergency.

Activists attempted to launch the first drone at about 3am within the airport’s three-mile (5km) exclusion zone
but they said the authorities used jamming technology to prevent it taking off.

Heathrow said there had been no disruption to flights,
adding that staff were working with the police and airport authorities
to ensure passenger safety.

On Thursday, police made seven pre-emptive arrests of activists
from the Heathrow Pause group
including a co-founder of Extinction Rebellion.

Officers confirmed two more people had been arrested near the airport
on Friday morning on suspicion of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance.

Protesters had planned to fly drones outside any flight paths at no higher than about 1.8 metres (6ft).
They had notified the airport and the authorities of their plans weeks ago and
said that once a drone flight was over
its pilot would phone the police and wait to be arrested.

They had believed this would force the authorities to shut down Heathrow’s operations.
However, a spokesperson for the airport said this assumption was wrong because
an ongoing risk assessment would work out
what the best action was on a case-by-case basis.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/sep/13/heathrow-protests-two-held-near-airport-as-activists-threaten-drone-disruption

Twitter video:
https://twitter.com/ABC7Veronica/status/1202463585059819520

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/231137

Date: 04-DEC-2019
Time: 19:15 LT

A Eurocopter AS 350B-2 news helicopter, AIR7 HD,
suffered an in-flight collision with an object, believed to be a drone, while flying over downtown Los Angeles.

The pilot made a forced landing.

Damage was observed to the leading edge of the right-hand horizontal stabilizer.

The helicopter was flying at an altitude of around 1100 feet.

Die extinction rebellion activisten bereiken het tegengestelde van wat ze willen.

Vroeger was het nog een argument om met minimum fuel te vliegen, dat bij meerdere banen de kans op een diversion kleiner is. Nu hoeft er maar een drone ergens gespot te zijn en de hele luchthaven gaat minstens een uur dicht. Dus hoe vaker zoiets gebeurt, hoe minder er minimum getankt wordt.

Maar bij de extinction rebellion draait het vogens mij vooral om de instagram-effectiviteit en de persoonlijke profilering dan om een doordacht plan hoe ze de wereld beter gaan maken.

http://avherald.com/h?article=4c2909fd&opt=0

Incident: Austral E190 at Buenos Aires on Dec 21st 2018, collision with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in flight

By Simon Hradecky, created Monday, Jan 7th 2019 15:38Z, last updated Tuesday, Dec 17th 2019 18:

Argentina's JIAAC reported during the approach the aircraft was impacted by an object,
possibly a drone, on the left hand side of the fuselage.
The aircraft sustained minor damage. The occurrence was rated an incident and is being investigated.

On Dec 17th 2019 the JIAAC released their final report in Spanish only :rolleyes:

The report concludes the probable cause of the incident was:

An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) was flying in an area restricted for its use.

It was not possible to determine whether the UAV complied with the regulations
because no data were obtained from it or its operator.

The JIAAC reported the impact occurred at 4080 feet MSL just prior to beginning the final approach.
Traces of an oily gel-like transparent material
as well as fibers of other black material were found.

The fibers were sent for laboratory examination,
its ingredients were found to be compatible with carbon fiber.

The gel-like material was also sent for laboratory analysis
and was found compatible with polymers of acrylic acid (esters) and ethylene polyoxides,
which are present in batteries.

Based on this analysis it was concluded the aircraft collided with an unmanned aerial vehicle.

The area around the impact, considering winds as well as height and speed of the aircraft,
was searched, however, without finding anything.

The UAV was operated in night conditions
over populated area and over the final approach path into Aeroparque's runway 13
within the control zone of Aeroparque.

In Argentina a lot of drones capable of exceeding 4000 feet MSL are sold.

The JIAAC analysed the presence of a flight data and cockpit voice recorder on board of the E190
made it easier to determine the position and height of the collision.

Samples of debris, that were found embedded in the fuselage at the point of impact
made it possible to identify the device as UAV.

Identification of the type of the UAV however
was prevented due to no further remains of the UAV being found.

Based on reports by European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
it can be assumed that the UAV was sized middle or large.

The contact marks on the fuselage (Photo: Adrian):

http://avherald.com/h?article=4c2909fd&opt=0

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/01/15/heathrow-airport-deploys-new-drone-catching-system-prevent-gatwick/

Heathrow Airport deploys new drone-catching system to prevent Gatwick-style shutdown

15 January 2020

Heathrow Airport has installed a new drone-catching system
in a bid to avoid future shutdowns like the one that crippled Gatwick.

Europe’s busiest airport announced it is bringing a new monitoring system
that can detect and track drones entering its airspace.

The makers of the technology, Operational Solutions,
say it is also able to locate the pilot of a drone in any malicious attack.

Reading-based Operational Solutions said
they were under a strict nondisclosure agreement
but confirmed it had supplied a “bespoke” system to the airport.

It is unclear what systems the airport has in place
for taking out any rogue drones
once they are detected and such methods remain a closely-guarded secret.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/01/15/heathrow-airport-deploys-new-drone-catching-system-prevent-gatwick/